I may have found that Debian, Ubuntu, and Homebrew are not properly honoring licenses for dependencies of statically-linked compiled binaries — but it's also possible that I'm misunderstanding the rules for licensing of binaries in the first place. I wish to ask about this on the main site, but I'm not sure of the best way to go about presenting the question.
Option 1: Ask "Does open source licensing require ...?", present my understanding of the relevant rules, and then present the behavior observed by the distributors as a counterpoint to my understanding, asking which one is correct.
Option 2: Ask "Does open source licensing require ...?", but do not bring up the distributors' behavior. If the answer to this question is "Yes," follow up with a separate question asking whether or how the distributors' behavior fulfills the relevant requirements. (Would the second question even be on-topic?)
Option 3: Ask "Are Debian, Ubuntu, and Homebrew violating licensing requirements?", in which I present my understanding of the relevant licensing requirements, describe the distributors' behavior, and ask how the latter can satify the former, all the while raking in those sweet, sweet, HNQ views for the inflammatory title.